A Useable Achievement Chart for the Ontario Curriculum, Grades 11 and 12, Canadian and World Studies, 2015

Art Lightstone

If you're like me, you often find yourself wishing the Ontario Ministry of Education provided a more user-friendly version of their curriculum documents. The Achievement Charts found in our curriculum guidelines are certainly no exception. These charts tend to be excessively wordy and repetitive, to the point where they become so dense and cluttered that students and parents can find it difficult to comprehend the relationship between the various categories of knowledge and skills, the achievement levels, and all of the associated descriptors. Moreover, the document is long (usually two pages), and is published as a Adobe Acrobat file, which is dreadfully difficult to copy and paste from.

Thus, I often take it upon myself to produce a streamlined version of the achievement charts found in our curriculum documents so that I can use the charts in my work.

Linked to the bottom of this page, you will find such a streamlined version of the 2015 Ontario Curriculum, Grades 11 and 12, Canadian and World Studies achievement chart. This version of the chart is a one-page document that teachers can readily use for assessing their students. 

A Few Points to Note: 

The original achievement chart in the 2015 Ontario Curriculum, Grades 11 and 12, Canadian and World Studies did not include a Level 0 to specifically address a non-existent level of skill or application. I have added this level because, otherwise, when entering an actual mark that is between 1 to 4 in a grade manager, the lowest level of achievement (a Level 1) would be calculated as a 25% grade. I found that adding a Level 0 to be necessary when actually recording these marks in a grade manager for my Classwork Portfolio, and so I highly recommend employing the five-scale version of the Achievement Chart.  

I should also point out that Page 41 of the 2015 Ontario Curriculum, Grades 11 and 12, Canadian and World Studies states that specific “qualifiers” are used with the descriptors in the achievement chart to describe student performance at each of the four levels of achievement – the qualifier “limited” is used for level 1; “some” for level 2; “considerable” for level 3; and a “high degree of” or “thorough” for level 4. Hence, achievement at level 3 in the Thinking category for the criterion “use of planning skills” would be described in the achievement chart as “[The student] uses planning skills with considerable effectiveness.”

Examples of the various categories of knowledge and skills:

The original achievement chart in the 2015 Ontario Curriculum, Grades 11 and 12, Canadian and World Studies contains a number of examples within the chart itself. Those examples were removed from the version of the achievement chart that I have made available here in an effort to both streamline the chart and to more clearly delineate the connection between the various categories of knowledge and skills and the descriptors associated with the various levels of achievement.

Nonetheless, I do present the various examples that were originally contained within the achievement chart. I have simply separated them out from the chart itself and then presented them on the back of the page. The examples I am speaking of are presented below:

• Knowledge of content: facts, terms, definitions
• Understanding of content: concepts, ideas, theories, interrelationships, procedures, processes, methodologies, spatial technologies
• Use of planning skills: organizing an inquiry; formulating questions; gathering and organizing data, evidence, and information; setting goals; focusing research
• Use of processing skills: interpreting, analysing, synthesizing, and evaluating data, evidence, and information; analysing maps; detecting point of view and bias; formulating conclusions
• Use of critical/creative thinking processes: applying concepts of disciplinary thinking; using inquiry, problem-solving, and decision-making processes
• Expression and organization of ideas and information: clear expression, logical organization) in oral, visual, and written forms
• Communication for different audiences: (e.g. peers, adults) and purposes: (e.g., to inform, to persuade) in oral, visual, and written forms
• Use of conventions: mapping and graphing conventions, communication conventions), vocabulary, and terminology of the discipline in oral, visual, and written forms
• Application of knowledge and skills: concepts, procedures, spatial skills, processes, technologies) in familiar contexts
• Transfer of knowledge and skills: concepts of thinking, procedures, spatial skills, methodologies, technologies) to new contexts
• Making connections within and between various contexts (e.g., between topics/issues being studied and everyday life; between disciplines; between past, present, and future contexts; in different spatial, cultural, or environmental contexts; in proposing and/or taking action to address related issues; in making predictions)
• Use of conventions: mapping and graphing conventions, communication conventions, vocabulary, and terminology of the discipline, either in oral, visual, or written forms.

Thus, I have modified the achievement chart in an effort to produce a highly useable, one-page achievement chart that acknowledges all levels of skill and achievement from 0% to 100%. Moreover, I have distilled this modified version of the achievement chart into both PDF and MS Word files. These files are linked below. Please feel free to use and modify them as you see fit. 

​
Downloadable Files:

---

achievement_chart_canada_and_world_studies_2015__modified_.docx
File Size:	11 kb
File Type:	docx

Download File

---

achievement_chart_canada_and_world_studies_2015__modified_.pdf
File Size:	115 kb
File Type:	pdf

Download File

---